Enable write ahead logging
Write ahead log vs journaling
The purpose of this can be illustrated by an example. Advantages include: WAL is significantly faster in most scenarios. The decision of how often to run checkpoints may therefore vary from one application to another depending on the relative read and write performance requirements of the application. On success, the pragma will return the string "wal". There is an additional quasi-persistent "-wal" file and "-shm" shared memory file associated with each database, which can make SQLite less appealing for use as an application file-format. This helps to prevent "latch-up" in applications running on a busy disk drive. The wal-index helps find content in the WAL file much faster, but performance still falls off with increasing WAL file size. For example, if it is known that a particular database will only be accessed by threads within a single process, the wal-index can be implemented using heap memory instead of true shared memory. Additionally, because of the separate files, an app with multiple threads is able to read from the DB while it is being written to. Other methods for creating nameless shared memory blocks are not portable across the various flavors of unix. Transactions that involve changes against multiple ATTACHed databases are atomic for each individual database, but are not atomic across all databases as a set. If the VFS does not support shared-memory methods, then the attempt to open a database that is already in WAL mode, or the attempt convert a database into WAL mode, will fail. Tip: Because WAL restores database file contents after a crash, journaled file systems are not necessary for reliable storage of the data files or WAL files.
The WAL journal mode will be set on all connections to the same database file if it is set on any one connection. Reading and writing can proceed concurrently.
Because writers do nothing that would interfere with the actions of readers, writers and readers can run at the same time. But it is possible to get SQLite into a state where the WAL file will grow without bound, causing excess disk space usage and slow queries speeds. Moving the WAL file transactions back into the database is called a "checkpoint". How WAL Works The traditional rollback journal works by writing a copy of the original unchanged database content into a separate rollback journal file and then writing changes directly into the database file. But for most types of usage, WAL is worth using. If the conversion to WAL could not be completed for example, if the VFS does not support the necessary shared-memory primitives then the journaling mode will be unchanged and the string returned from the primitive will be the prior journaling mode for example "delete". Concurrency When a read operation begins on a WAL-mode database, it first remembers the location of the last valid commit record in the WAL. It is not possible to open read-only WAL databases. Tip: Because WAL restores database file contents after a crash, journaled file systems are not necessary for reliable storage of the data files or WAL files. However, there are situations when it's reasonable to have the WAL disabled to get better performance.
Pages that are changed by the transaction should only be written into the WAL file once. Reading and writing can proceed concurrently. Applications using WAL do not have to do anything in order to for these checkpoints to occur.
SQLite will automatically take care of it. Modern file systems typically use a variant of WAL for at least file system metadata called journaling.
To check if write-ahead logging is enabled for a specified cache, use the IgniteCluster. When you update a SQLite Database within a transaction, the standard behavior is that the original data is copied to a separate rollback file and the new data is written directly to the DB file.
Write ahead log postgres
Additionally, because of the separate files, an app with multiple threads is able to read from the DB while it is being written to. But presumably every read transactions will eventually end and the checkpointer will be able to continue. However, there are situations when it's reasonable to have the WAL disabled to get better performance. Try it with your apps to see if they get a benefit. A database in WAL mode cannot generally be opened from read-only media because even ordinary reads in WAL mode require recovery-like operations. Or they can turn off the automatic checkpoints and run checkpoints during idle moments or in a separate thread or process. Tip: Because WAL restores database file contents after a crash, journaled file systems are not necessary for reliable storage of the data files or WAL files. Applications using WAL do not have to do anything in order to for these checkpoints to occur. Reading and writing can proceed concurrently. On success, the pragma will return the string "wal". This is because the incomplete transaction left over from the crash must be rolled back prior to reading the database and that rollback cannot occur without write permission on all files and the directory containing them. It is not possible to open read-only WAL databases.
Data updates survive only process crash. This scenario can be avoided by ensuring that there are "reader gaps": times when no processes are reading from the database and that checkpoints are attempted during those times.
Because the WAL can be growing and adding new commit records while various readers connect to the database, each reader can potentially have its own end mark.
Thus a long-running read transaction can prevent a checkpointer from making progress. So in the vast majority of cases, applications need not worry about the WAL file at all.
based on 97 review